Get Resource

Replaceable batteries stop being a courtesy on 18 February 2027. The rule makers would rather not quote is short: a battery must come out safely, with or without tools, by someone with no repair training. Miss that test and the product cannot carry a CE mark, which means it cannot be sold in the EU at all.

Why replaceable batteries become a sales question

A glued-in battery stops being a repair problem and becomes a sales problem, because under the rule a product that cannot be CE marked cannot be sold in the EU at all. The maker's design choice now decides its market.

The wording does the work. Removable means safe removal by an end user or an independent professional, with or without tools, and the end user is an adult with no battery-replacement knowledge. The test is that adult, not a technician with a bench. A 2026 law-firm summary of Article 11 in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 sets out that reading. It sits alongside the EU right to repair directive, which has applied since 31 July 2026.

Specialised tools must be supplied free of charge, and a maker cannot require its own proprietary tool for the swap. That closes a familiar door: a battery kept behind the brand's service kit is no longer a sales feature. The sanction is market access, not a warning letter. The same pattern shows up in packaging, where the EU packaging regulation has been live since 12 August 2026.

Four numbers set the stakes, and one of them is our own count. The count runs from this article's date, 16 October 2026, to the cutoff. The other three come from the guidance and the standard it follows, and each one changes what a buyer can check at the shelf.

The tool count matters most to a repair shop. The rule grades the kit a swap needs, from basic tools up to proprietary ones, rather than the brand printed on the box. For a removable design, a shop's access no longer depends on owning the maker's kit.

Which models does the removal rule actually reach?

The rule works by device category rather than brand, so the first question is which category a model falls into, and that matters more than the brand name on the box. Phones and tablets appear only as devices that may require removable batteries, and laptops and e-bikes are not named at all.

Read the table as a buyer's decision aid. Each row names one dimension, and the glyph at the start of the last column says which way that row pushes.

The table makes one thing plain. A buyer's risk is timing and device category, not the brand's promise. Check the sale date first, then the category, and only then read the warranty.

Can a glued-in battery still be sold in the EU?

Yes, in two cases: stock placed on the market before 18 February 2027, which is unlikely to be affected, or a product an exemption covers, which needs individual assessment. Anything else placed later must pass the removal test.

Stock is the easy part. The harder part is the exemption list, because a product only gets through it after an individual assessment and evidence that replacement is not possible with current technology. Wet-environment appliances and some medical devices sit on that list, so expect a maker to claim one before it shows the proof.

Compliance is also a reporting question. The EU Cyber Resilience Act reporting duties have been live since 11 September 2026, which shows regulators now write product deadlines with teeth.

Two gaps make the rule harder to use than it reads. The guidance sets no period during which replacement batteries must stay available, so removal is promised and spares are not. It also gives no publication date, and its removal classes follow the EN 45554:2020 standard, so the test a product is judged against has no date of its own.

• Ask for the spare-battery period in writing before you buy.
• Treat an exemption claim as a claim until the maker shows the assessment.
• Read "may require" as a question for the category, not an answer for the model.
• Count "unlikely to be affected" as a risk, not a guarantee.

Before you buy anything placed on sale after 18 February 2027, open the product page and find out whether an adult can remove the battery with basic tools. If the page is silent, treat the model as glued in and buy the one that says otherwise.

“It was opened by an unauthorised shop, so the warranty is void and we can't repair it.” Makers have leaned on that line for years, usually with a discount code for a new model. Since 31 July 2026 it has been the wrong answer. The EU right to repair, Directive (EU) 2024/1799, makes that refusal and most of its cousins unlawful for covered phones and large home appliances. It does not set the price, and that is where the fight has moved.

Which refusals does the EU right to repair now ban?

The Directive strips makers of their two favourite refusals for covered goods, the expired warranty and the earlier third-party repair, and leaves them one lawful excuse: that repair is impossible, in which case they may offer a refurbished unit.

Start with “out of warranty”. Law firm Fieldfisher reads the text bluntly: past the legal guarantee, the maker must still repair goods in the Directive's annex, counted from the last unit of that model sold, not from your receipt. That excuse now describes their sales policy, not the law.

Does the EU rule cover products bought before July 2026?

Yes, the manufacturer's duty to repair applies to covered products bought before 31 July 2026, so a phone or washing machine from 2022 qualifies; only the guarantee extension for choosing repair is limited to newer purchases.

Can a maker refuse because a third-party shop opened it?

No, a manufacturer can no longer refuse to repair a covered product because an independent shop or the owner repaired it before, and it may not use contract terms or software locks to block that repair.

Compatible second-hand and 3D-printed parts that meet safety rules cannot be shut out either, so the old advice to stay with authorised centres is outdated. The same devices face other EU duties too, from the Cyber Resilience Act's 24-hour incident reporting duty to the EU packaging regulation that went live in August.

Four numbers decide how hard you can push: Fieldfisher on the duty, Acer's battery prices and a laundry audit reported by Cybernews on 8 September 2026, and Right to Repair Europe's tally of the Commission's notices.

Look hard at the battery range. One brand, one part, and the dearest tier costs about nine times the cheapest: on our arithmetic, a €114 gap that the word “reasonable” does nothing to close. Ask which tier yours falls into, in writing, before you hand it over.

What the rules give you, line by line

Read the table as a checklist: each row pairs a refusal or charge you might hear with what the Directive now says, so you can see at once whether the law backs a repair or leaves you exposed.

The crosses fall on coverage and on finding a repairer, never on what a maker may refuse. Price and paperwork are where you push.

That paperwork gap is measurable. Right to Repair Europe and iFixit, reviewing smartphone records in EPREL, the EU's product database, reported in September 2026 that about 80% lack the repair information makers must publish. The official database will not hand you a parts price.

Where will makers still push back?

Makers will push back on price, because the Directive demands reasonable prices for parts and tools without defining them, and on enforcement, because most member states missed the deadline to write the rules into national law.

Right to Repair Europe has flagged the gap: the text says “reasonable” and stops. Our view, which is opinion, not settled law: a repair quote above the maker's own trade-in deal on a new unit is hard to call reasonable, and that comparison belongs in your written complaint.

On 25 September 2026 the Commission sent late-transposition notices to France, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands and the rest of that group, each with two months to reply: on our count, a first deadline of 25 November 2026. Buyers in Germany, Austria, Ireland and Denmark, absent from that list, stand on firmer ground. Readers in Great Britain get none of this; their rules run separately, like the new UK subscription cancellation rules.

• A refurbished swap offered as “repair impossible” with no reason given.
• A parts quote given by phone only, never by email or on paper.
• Vague “parts unavailable” answers for a model that is still on sale.

So here is the decision. If your device is covered and the only refusal on offer is the warranty or a past independent repair, refuse the replacement. This week, email the manufacturer and ask for three answers in writing: whether it claims repair is impossible and why, which price tier your part falls into, and, for anything bought since 31 July 2026, how long your guarantee runs afterwards. A maker that answers has given you a quote to compare. One that won't has given you evidence.

Related: replaceable batteries under the 2027 EU removal test

Somewhere on your bank statement sits a line the provider hopes you never read twice: an annual renewal, taken in full, for a service you stopped opening months ago. Under the new UK subscription rules, that line stops being final. You get a warning before it lands and 14 days to walk away after it does. If you joined online, the exit has to be online too.

The catch is timing. None of this protects a renewal that goes through before the rules start, and the start date has already moved once.

When do the new UK subscription rules start?

The government now points to January 2027, earlier than the spring 2027 start set out in its April response, but the detailed regulations have not been laid, so treat January as a target rather than a promise.

Two dates are in circulation. The consultation response of 2 April 2026, summarised by Bristows, said spring 2027. By 10 August, Advanced Television was reporting January, and on 4 September the law firm Brodies confirmed the shorter timeline. So a provider claiming in February that the rules are not in force yet may simply be out of date.

The money is not small change. A government estimate, quoted by White & Case in its client note (retrieved October 2026), puts UK spending on unwanted subscriptions at about £1.6bn a year. Your forgotten plan is a share of that pool you can take back. The pattern is familiar from how AI token prices collapsed while enterprise bills rose: the unit looks cheap, and the bill climbs because nobody audits it.

Four numbers decide whether an hour with your banking app is worth it. Advanced Television's August report supplies the cost and the unwanted count, White & Case the fine ceiling; the time left is our own count to January.

The fine ceiling is the one to keep in your pocket. It applies to worldwide group turnover, and Brodies counts roughly £6.2m in CMA penalties since the regulator's direct fining powers began. An email that names the CMA is not a threat, just a reminder of who else might read it. Like the Plastic Packaging Tax mass balance rules due in April 2027, this rule's fine print arrives late, so plan around the direction.

Can I get a refund after a subscription auto-renews?

Yes, once the regime starts: an annual plan that auto-renews, or a free trial that rolls into paid, opens a fresh 14-day cooling-off window, and the provider must refund you to your original payment method within 14 days.

Here is how the bill line changes, comparing today's position with the rules as the government has described them.

Every new right hangs on a notice the provider has to send. Silence used to work in its favour; now silence is the breach, so keep every reminder email. Our own sum is blunter: at the average cost, one forgotten plan is roughly £168 a year, so a single cancelled renewal pays for the hour you spend checking.

Where the provider still gets the last word

Providers keep two real levers, the start date and the refund maths for any service you have used during the window, and the final regulations could still trim the detail before they take effect next year.

White & Case reads the plan as a proportionate refund for digital services used during the renewal window, and a full refund, standard delivery included, for goods sent back. You pay for the days you used, not the year.

What counts as use is the grey area I would watch. An app syncing in the background, a profile nobody has opened: in my view neither should count, but expect providers to argue otherwise until the final text is laid. Regulators often enforce the headline first and settle edges later, as with the EU AI Act transparency duties that went live in August and California EPR packaging fees invoiced while the 2027 rules stay draft.

Do companies have to let me cancel a subscription online?

If you signed up online, yes: Brodies and Bristows both read the rules as requiring an online way out, and terms that make cancelling disproportionately hard will not stand. Or rather, that is the rule on paper; you may still need to quote it once.

• A renewal that lands before the start date is judged under today's law, not the new one.
• The renewal window covers free trials ending and annual or longer contracts renewing, not rolling monthly plans.
• Refunds go back to the original payment method, so a cancelled card can slow yours down.

This week, open the last twelve months of your bank statement, find every line marked annual or renewal, and cancel any that renew before January; for the rest, put the renewal date in your calendar and save the notice when it arrives.

Related: what the EU right to repair now bans manufacturers from refusing