Get Resource

The line PackUK would rather you skimmed sits in its own modulation statement: from the 2026-27 invoice, every tonne of red-rated household packaging pays the amber fee times 1.2, then 1.6, then 2.0. Not a fine. A multiplier, set in policy in June 2025 and applied to packaging you already sold in 2025. If your notice of liability lands this winter, the packaging EPR fees on a red pack were fixed by last year's decisions, at a rate the regulator still calls illustrative.

Why does a red RAM rating cost more every year?

A red rating costs more each year because PackUK's modulation statement multiplies the household disposal fee for red material by 1.2 in 2026-27, 1.6 in 2027-28 and 2.0 in 2028-29, while amber stays at base.

PackUK also says modulation does not raise total fees: red money comes back as an equal percentage discount on every green tonne. So the surcharge is a transfer. A red laminate pouch pays for a rival's mono-material one, and no invoice says so. Selling into Europe too? Our guide to EPR under the EU PPWR and seven US states runs on different data years.

The timing is what the scheme undersells. The statement says 2026-27 fees are calculated on packaging supplied in 2025, so that bill was settled when the stock shipped. On the same one-year lag, the 2.0 year reads 2027 supply, which makes 1 January 2027 the last date a redesign counts in full against the steepest invoice. That's about nine weeks away. Plastic lines also face the Plastic Packaging Tax mass balance rules from April 2027 change how recycled content is proved on the same packs.

Four numbers decide whether this is your problem. They come from PackUK and Defra's illustrative Year 2 fee table, published 16 December 2025, and the government's producer guidance, updated 19 August 2026, set against a year-one plastic base of £423 a tonne.

The green discount is the slipperiest of the four. Funded from red revenue, it floats with how much red the whole market reports, so if rivals clean up their packs, your reward for switching shrinks too.

How much will packaging EPR fees add to a red plastic line?

On illustrative 2026-27 rates, a tonne of red plastic costs £90 more than amber, and with the base held flat that gap grows to £273 in 2027-28 and £455 in 2028-29.

Worked example: a brand supplied 100 tonnes of red-rated plastic household packaging in the data year. Assumptions: the amber base stays at PackUK's illustrative £455 a tonne and the line stays red. In 2026-27 the bill is 100 × £545 = £54,500, against £45,500 had it been amber. In 2027-28 it's 100 × £455 × 1.6 = £72,800. In 2028-29 it's 100 × £455 × 2.0 = £91,000. Add the three surcharges over amber (£9,000 + £27,300 + £45,500) and the red rating costs £81,800 across three invoices.

Find your row by tonnes of red plastic, then read across to the fee year: each cell is your extra over amber, base held flat.

The shaded cell is the worked example's final year. One row down, that invoice carries £227,500 of surcharge; one column left, the 2027-28 bill, takes £18,200 off it.

What happens if my packaging is rated red under RAM?

If your packaging is rated red under RAM, you pay the multiplied disposal fee on every tonne, unless it is medical packaging a regulation forces into that format, which is reported as amber-medical instead.

The RAM recyclability rating is yours to declare. PackUK says producers self-assess against RAM v1.1, regulators check, and the newest RAM version applies when invoices are generated. So an unevidenced green claim is an enforcement risk, and today's amber pack can turn red if the method tightens.

Your rate also moves with other people's paperwork. Wood's illustrative amber fee is £450 a tonne against £280 in year one, a 61% jump PackUK and Defra blame on less wood being reported, some of it now filed under other categories. A pallet maker changed nothing and pays more. Our opinion, not a finding: a fee that swings this far on reclassification is a shaky base to multiply by two. US exporters saw the same with California's EPR packaging fees, invoiced while its rules were still draft.

• Confirmed 2026-27 rates were due in June 2026; ERP UK, a compliance scheme, reported on 17 September 2026 they could still change, with notices from November.
• Government guidance says a compliance scheme cannot pay your disposal fee for you.
• The multipliers stand until a review no later than 2028.
• Medical packaging is not exempt unless a regulation forces the red format.

Our call: pull your 2025 data return this week, list every household line reported red, and price each at twice its amber rate. Where that beats the redesign quote, change the pack before 1 January 2027. This is wrong for small producers, who pay no disposal fee, and for any redesign that would rate red under the next RAM version, so confirm your status on the government's producer guidance first.

"Ford will continue to provide customers in India with ongoing parts, service, and warranty support." That is Ford Motor Company's own sentence, from its 9 September 2021 release ending local car manufacturing, and the line it would rather owners stopped quoting. Read it beside a shuttered showroom and see what it leaves out: how many Ford service centres, and for how long. Owners reporting closures are not imagining a broken promise. The promise never held a number.

Will Ford continue to service cars in India?

Yes, on paper: Ford's September 2021 release promises Indian customers continued parts, service and warranty support, but it commits to no measurable figure, so a workshop near your home is something Ford never actually promised you.

Ford also said it "will continue full customer support operations for these vehicles with service, aftermarket parts and warranty coverage." That puts the duty on Ford, not the franchise that stamped your service book, so write your claim to Ford India.

Worse, Ford promised to help dealers move "from sales and service to parts and service support": a licence to shrink, with nothing counted. Europe attaches duties to repair, as its EU right-to-repair directive shows, and takes sealed-battery devices off EU shelves by a fixed date. Ford's pledge reads like the draft before anyone asked for dates.

Why leave the number out? Ford's release booked more than $2 billion in India operating losses over 10 years. An exit priced on losses treats after-sales as a cost to cut, and an uncounted pledge lets it shrink quietly.

Four numbers decide whether you trust the pledge or plan around it. Ford's release gives the depots, the Government of India's IndBiz portal the Chennai investment (31 October 2025), and Tata Motors' filing of 10 January 2023 the Sanand plant price: Rs 725.7 crore, cash Ford recovered on exit. Two cards are our arithmetic.

The depot card reaches your driveway. Ford kept warehouses in Delhi, Chennai, Mumbai, Sanand and Kolkata, with no promised delivery time, so a car laid up in a district town waits on a metro courier.

Where can I service my Ford car in India now?

At whichever outlet Ford India confirms in writing as authorised today, because the company publishes no fixed count and a dealer you used before 2021 may since have stopped servicing Ford cars altogether.

Find your situation in the first column; read across for the step and why it holds.

Worked example: the third row's sum. Assume the nearest confirmed outlet is 120 km away (a 240 km round trip), a diesel car doing 15 km a litre, and diesel at Rs 90 a litre, our assumption. Fuel: 240 ÷ 15 = 16 litres; 16 × Rs 90 = Rs 1,440 a visit. Two services a year cost Rs 2,880 before a lost working day.

Now run yours in under a minute: double the road distance to your confirmed outlet, divide by your car's mileage, multiply by your last fuel price. If that beats the gap between the authorised quote and a local garage's, the garage wins on cost, though not always on warranty.

Ford service centres: what the pledge leaves out

The pledge leaves out every number an owner could enforce: Ford names no minimum outlet count, no maximum distance to an outlet and no year when support ends, so a shrinking network breaks nothing Ford actually wrote.

The strongest case against Ford is its own spending. IndBiz reports the Chennai project will build 235,000 engines a year from 2029, yet Ford has not published a simple list of authorised workshops. A company building engines in Tamil Nadu cannot plead it has left India.

Our view, and it is opinion: "ongoing" ought to mean reachable. Whether a consumer commission would read a minimum reach into that word is unsettled; a pledge with no figure gives it little to measure. Europe's Cyber Resilience Act rules make connected-product makers state a support period. Ford's owners got no end date. Or rather, no date at all.

Watch for these before switching:

• A dealer's signboard is not proof it still services Ford cars.
• A part "on order" with no date is normal when it ships from a metro depot.
• Non-genuine parts fitted outside the network may give Ford grounds to refuse a warranty claim; read your terms first.
• A dealer-sold extended warranty may depend on its underwriter; find that name on your paperwork.

Ford wrote the pledge; make it produce a number. This week, email Ford India's customer care with your registration number and ask for the nearest authorised outlet handling warranty work. If the reply names one you can reach, stay authorised. If it cannot, that written silence is the figure the 2021 pledge never gave you, and a trusted independent garage fitting genuine parts is the better call. Under a warranty requiring authorised servicing, escalate through the National Consumer Helpline first.

Replaceable batteries stop being a courtesy on 18 February 2027. The rule makers would rather not quote is short: a battery must come out safely, with or without tools, by someone with no repair training. Miss that test and the product cannot carry a CE mark, which means it cannot be sold in the EU at all.

Why replaceable batteries become a sales question

A glued-in battery stops being a repair problem and becomes a sales problem, because under the rule a product that cannot be CE marked cannot be sold in the EU at all. The maker's design choice now decides its market.

The wording does the work. Removable means safe removal by an end user or an independent professional, with or without tools, and the end user is an adult with no battery-replacement knowledge. The test is that adult, not a technician with a bench. A 2026 law-firm summary of Article 11 in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 sets out that reading. It sits alongside the EU right to repair directive, which has applied since 31 July 2026.

Specialised tools must be supplied free of charge, and a maker cannot require its own proprietary tool for the swap. That closes a familiar door: a battery kept behind the brand's service kit is no longer a sales feature. The sanction is market access, not a warning letter. The same pattern shows up in packaging, where the EU packaging regulation has been live since 12 August 2026.

Four numbers set the stakes, and one of them is our own count. The count runs from this article's date, 16 October 2026, to the cutoff. The other three come from the guidance and the standard it follows, and each one changes what a buyer can check at the shelf.

The tool count matters most to a repair shop. The rule grades the kit a swap needs, from basic tools up to proprietary ones, rather than the brand printed on the box. For a removable design, a shop's access no longer depends on owning the maker's kit.

Which models does the removal rule actually reach?

The rule works by device category rather than brand, so the first question is which category a model falls into, and that matters more than the brand name on the box. Phones and tablets appear only as devices that may require removable batteries, and laptops and e-bikes are not named at all.

Read the table as a buyer's decision aid. Each row names one dimension, and the glyph at the start of the last column says which way that row pushes.

The table makes one thing plain. A buyer's risk is timing and device category, not the brand's promise. Check the sale date first, then the category, and only then read the warranty.

Can a glued-in battery still be sold in the EU?

Yes, in two cases: stock placed on the market before 18 February 2027, which is unlikely to be affected, or a product an exemption covers, which needs individual assessment. Anything else placed later must pass the removal test.

Stock is the easy part. The harder part is the exemption list, because a product only gets through it after an individual assessment and evidence that replacement is not possible with current technology. Wet-environment appliances and some medical devices sit on that list, so expect a maker to claim one before it shows the proof.

Compliance is also a reporting question. The EU Cyber Resilience Act reporting duties have been live since 11 September 2026, which shows regulators now write product deadlines with teeth.

Two gaps make the rule harder to use than it reads. The guidance sets no period during which replacement batteries must stay available, so removal is promised and spares are not. It also gives no publication date, and its removal classes follow the EN 45554:2020 standard, so the test a product is judged against has no date of its own.

• Ask for the spare-battery period in writing before you buy.
• Treat an exemption claim as a claim until the maker shows the assessment.
• Read "may require" as a question for the category, not an answer for the model.
• Count "unlikely to be affected" as a risk, not a guarantee.

Before you buy anything placed on sale after 18 February 2027, open the product page and find out whether an adult can remove the battery with basic tools. If the page is silent, treat the model as glued in and buy the one that says otherwise.